a separate concurrence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a separate concurrence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts to refer to an agreement or opinion that is distinct from others, often in a judicial setting. Example: "The judge issued a separate concurrence, outlining his unique perspective on the case."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Justice Breyer also wrote a separate concurrence.

The New York Times

But Justice Anthony Kennedy did, in a separate concurrence.

The New York Times - Magazine

Justice Scalia wrote a separate concurrence, also citing Wickard v. Filburn.

The New York Times

He managed to persuade Roberts to join his opinion, though Kennedy and Alito wrote a separate concurrence, dissociating themselves from Breyer's broad reading of the Necessary and Proper Clause.

The New Yorker

In a separate concurrence, however, Judge Brown, joined by Judge Sentelle, wrote to criticize the Supreme Court's long history of providing inadequate protection to economic liberties.

Huffington Post

In a separate concurrence, Judge Stephen Reinhardt elaborated upon this latter point, noting that the government evidently thought that its arguments were entitled to respect and lawyers cannot afford to assume that judges will not respect the government's arguments.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas, in separate concurrences, voted with the majority but did not adopt its reasoning.

The New York Times

Though Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. all joined Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's majority opinion on its main point, three of them added separate concurrences.

The New York Times

There's no way to know for sure sometimes Justices write separate concurrences explaining why they're joining the majority, but they didn't here.

Vice

Kennedy and Roberts joined the four liberals in the majority for Evenwel v. Abbott to affirm the 14th Amendment's dictum of "one person, one vote," while Alito and Thomas filed separate concurrences.

Huffington Post

Antonin Scalia, a conservative justice, wrote a separate one-paragraph concurrence saying that the only reason he was joining the majority was because the plaintiff "did not ask us to overrule Grutter's holding" that diversity permits the use of race.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about legal decisions, use "a separate concurrence" to clearly indicate that a justice agrees with the outcome but has different reasoning.

Common error

Avoid using "a separate concurrence" when a justice simply agrees with the majority opinion without providing additional or differing reasoning. In such cases, no separate concurrence is necessary.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a separate concurrence" functions as a noun phrase, where 'separate' is an adjective modifying the noun 'concurrence'. It denotes a distinct legal opinion that agrees with the court's decision but offers different reasoning. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

18%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a separate concurrence" is a noun phrase used to describe a distinct legal opinion that agrees with the court's final decision but provides different reasoning. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness and common usage, particularly in News & Media. When using this phrase, ensure that the justice truly offers a different legal interpretation, and is not simply agreeing with the existing opinion. Alternatives such as "an individual concurring opinion" or "a distinct concurring statement" can also be considered depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

An individual concurring opinion

Replaces "separate" with "individual" and rephrases the structure while retaining the core meaning.

A distinct concurring statement

Substitutes "concurrence" with "statement" to offer a more general term, maintaining the idea of agreement.

A standalone agreement

Emphasizes the independent nature of the concurrence by using "standalone".

An isolated concurring view

Highlights the isolated nature of the opinion, suggesting it stands apart from the main view.

A discrete concurring judgment

Replaces 'separate' with 'discrete' and 'opinion' with 'judgment', indicating a clear distinction in legal viewpoints.

A self-contained concurring perspective

Stresses the completeness and independence of the concurring perspective.

A unique concurring rationale

Focuses on the unique reasoning behind the concurrence.

A differing concurring interpretation

Highlights that the concurrence presents a different interpretation while still agreeing with the outcome.

A supplementary concurring note

Positions the concurrence as an addition or supplement to the main opinion.

An alternative concurring analysis

Emphasizes that the concurrence offers a different method of analysis leading to the same conclusion.

FAQs

What does "a separate concurrence" mean in legal terms?

In legal terms, "a separate concurrence" refers to a situation where a judge agrees with the final decision of the court but writes a separate opinion to explain their different reasoning or legal analysis.

How does "a separate concurrence" differ from a dissent?

While both are separate opinions, "a separate concurrence" indicates agreement with the outcome but disagreement with the reasoning, whereas a dissent signifies disagreement with both the outcome and the reasoning.

Can you provide an alternative to using "a separate concurrence" in writing?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "an individual concurring opinion", or "a distinct concurring statement" to convey a similar meaning.

When is it appropriate to mention "a separate concurrence" in a legal analysis?

It's appropriate when the judge's reasoning offers a different legal interpretation or perspective that is relevant to the case or legal precedent. It indicates that even though they agree with the conclusion, their path to that conclusion was different.