For instance, for L, d, r, q = 100, 14, 5, 6 (p = 11) we obtain a selectiveness of 99.992%, 99.957% and 99.835% for the methods FINE, GOOD and EXCELLENT, respectively.
Overall, except for three degenerated cases where EXCELLENT got 23% faster than FINE, we obtained an average slowdown of 81% with a selectiveness improvement of 130%.
For instance, if we have a selectiveness improvement of 30% against a slowdown of 75% (like the general average numbers for all 198 cases), it may still be worth it if the algorithm we are going to submit the filtered sequence to is, for instance, cubic, since 1.33 > 1.75.
Here, like in the previous comparison, but now with even more striking numbers, it is clear that EXCELLENT performs better than FINE, bringing a selectiveness improvement of 4.45 against a time slowdown of only 25% for error cases larger than p/ L ≥ 25%.
We further supposed that the extra cost of solving the Parallelogram q-hits Chaining Problem would be smaller for higher values of threshold p. What Table 1 shows us is in agreement with these expectations, since for the cases in which d/ L ≥ 10% and p/ L ≥ 25%, we obtain a selectiveness improvement of 69% in contrast to a time slowdown of 20%.
For instance, we observed that the 15 cases with time slowdown higher than 4 (ranging from 4.28 to 9.36, with average 5.85) are exactly the 15 cases where p/ L ≤ 14%, and we can still verify a selectiveness improvement of 55% in contrast to a time slowdown of 38% for large error cases (d/ L ≥ 10%) with p/ L > 14% (not shown on Table 1).
For instance, the temporal limit of binocular rivalry has several characteristics that are consistent with activity patterns of (binocular) complex cells in the primary visual cortex, e.g. independencies of eye-of-origin information, and contrast-polarity, and a pattern-selectiveness of adaptation [44] [47].
Articles reporting quantification with other β-amyloid compounds have been excluded when (a) there was uncertainty about the selectiveness of the binding to amyloid plaques (e.g., C BF-227) or (b) utilization of recently released compounds still needing for a systematic evaluation (e.g., F-AZ4694, namely, NAV4694).
Getting big enough to see a path to monetizing without losing the inherent selectiveness of its brand promise looks like it's lining up to be Dice's post-Series A challenge.
On a concession level, biomass increased despite logging because of selectiveness of timber harvesting.
The country dummies are also a robustness check for whether the results are biased by variance in the selectiveness of the different national newspapers, such as could be expected for Austria.
