Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
However, appeal to selection for does not suffice to disambiguate content (Griffiths & Goode 1995, Neander 1995).
That set the stage for natural selection to do its work, Cochran and Harpending theorized.
If the replication-biased genome organisation in Sulfolobus does not correspond to selection for gene dosage effects, what does it reflect?
We employ a Bayesian framework for doing model selection.
In addition, what does it imply for policy selection?
Even though it seems like selection for OSCs doesn't affect codon usage, it is possible that it could affect the frequency with which one codon follows another in the genome.
Importantly, this does not reveal whether such an interaction occurs endogenously, and unless care is taken with the miRNA concentration and promoter selection for the reporter, it does not reveal whether it could happen under physiological conditions.
While this is not likely to be a candidate for follicle selection, it does highlight the transitional stages of the follicle as it progresses through development.
Natural selection, for Darwin, did not forbid cultural and individual developments on a timescale hundreds of thousands of times faster than evolutionary development.
From this point of view, Time's selection for 2006 does not disappoint.
Although initial retention opens a time window for positive selection, it doesn't directly accelerate positive selection.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com