The phrase "a second shell was" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing objects, events, or phenomena that involve multiple layers or components, such as in science or technology.
Example: "After the first experiment, a second shell was added to enhance the structure's stability."
Alternatives: "an additional shell was" or "a further shell was".
Detailed calculations for a third shell are presented to illustrate the mechanism of pairing.
The second shell was best fit with a Cu-Fe neighbor with an average coordination number of 1.5 (range: 1.3-1.9) and averageage interatomic length of 2.97 Å (range: 2.94-2.99 Å); the third shell was also best fit with a Cu-Fe neighbor with an average coordination number of 1.3 (range: 0.8-1.3) and averageage interatomic length of 3.44 Å (range: 3.43-3.48 Å) (Table 5).
In high dimensions the fraction of viable points becomes very small, and the probability of finding a viable point from the second shell is very low.
A secondary (significantly smaller) peak that corresponds with the second shell is also clearly visible.
In this condition, the second shell is no longer available for interacting with DNR, which is consequently released.
The second shell is capable of responding to temperature variations because of N,N′-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), the polymer of which is known to be temperature and pH responsive30,31.
The second shell is fitted to be ~ 4 Ni and ~ 2 Al with interatomic distances of 3.07 and 3.06 Å, respectively.
The intensity of the electrostatic potential in the second shell is in the order of 4 kBT, explaining the restriction on the translational motion of the ions at that distance from the protein.
The interpretation of the second shell becomes more complex in amorphous systems where the second shell is less well ordered; the third shell is even harder to interpret.
Structures in the second shell are compared in batches of 100, selecting those with the strongest connections first.
