The phrase "a second amendment with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a specific amendment or modification related to a particular context or document.
Example: "The committee proposed a second amendment with additional provisions to enhance the original agreement."
Alternatives: "an additional amendment with" or "a further amendment with".
Kimberly Jo Simac, founder of Northwoods Patriots in Wisconsin and author of "With My Rifle By My Side: A Second Amendment Lesson" * "'With My Rifle by My Side' is a story that conveys this right to children and teaches the honor and responsibility that come with the ownership and handling of guns.
We had a Democrat and a Republican -– both gun owners, both fierce defenders of our Second Amendment, with "A" grades from the NRA -- come together and worked together to write a common-sense compromise on background checks.
Though they may share a fierce belief in the Second Amendment with their male counterparts, female gun owners often learn to shoot for different reasons, their interest in and proficiency with firearms not just a hobby or a means for self-defense, but a statement of independence and personal power.
Stevie being Stevie, he decimated the second amendment with a masterful eloquence that would have made the founding fathers proud.
And we need to stop confusing the protections guaranteed by the Second Amendment with an imagined right to own semi-automatic weapons designed to be used by the military.
But no... without a First Amendment but with considerable resolution, the editors declined to cooperate.
In the United States, Floyd Abrams, a First Amendment lawyer with Cahill Gordon & Reindel, said compelling Mr. Randal to appear could set a perilous precedent.
George Freeman, a First Amendment lawyer with the law firm Jenner & Block, who represented Ms. Miller when he worked for The Times, said that Ms. Winter's case did not seem to warrant jail time.
James C. Goodale, a former vice chairman of the Times Company who is now a First Amendment lawyer with Debevoise & Plimpton, said yesterday that the deal "caps a very interesting period of history for The Washington Post and The New York Times, when the two papers have really diverged in terms of their approach to economic life".
Google has filed a First Amendment complaint with the Attorney General and Senator Leahy has proposed legislation to disclose more info to members of congress (yes, intelligence info is even hidden from Congress).
