Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a score score" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It appears to be a repetition that lacks clarity and context, making it unusable.
Example: "The game ended with a score score that left everyone confused."
Alternatives: "a score of" or "a total score of".
Exact(2)
Notice that comparing image A with image B can return a different number of matches than comparing image B with image A. Then, once the SIFT had returned the number of matches between two images, they were normalized to the number of descriptors of both to obtain a score: Score = mean left( { frac{matchesAB}{descriptorsA} + frac{matchesBA}{descriptorsB} } right).
In the former case, a weak hyperlink estimation is assumed when the link-based classifier returns a score (score l ) within a range of values having a lower bound threshold t1 and an upper bound threshold t2 (both thresholds are experimentally tuned).
Similar(58)
Behind each box there is a score (scoring matrix).
Three scores can be evaluated, a physical score (score for 0 16), a psychological distress score (0 32), and a total score (0 48).
In the drought scoring scale, ewst1 had a low score (score 0), indicating better tolerance, whereas the WT was susceptible with a higher score (score 7) under stress (Fig. 1A).
if x < 4 a poor score, score 4 6 may be ignored-the means the original score is good, and there is no need to change.
By having the normalized vector v i, it is possible to calculate L 2 -norm and use it as an overall score (Score i ).
As the subscales are highly correlated, we also report an overall PCQ score (score range 0 36).
Criteria for positive identification were a significant Mascot probability score (score >40; p < 0.05).
Each patient was rated using the 8-point Precise Diagnostic Score score, composed of a clinical score (0-4 points) and an imaging score (0-4 points).
Even though there is no common standard as to what score represents an acceptable score, scores as low as 0.7 can generally be considered to indicate an acceptable level of agreement (Fleiss et al. 2003).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com