Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a score of a" is not correct and usable in written English.
It seems to be an incomplete expression and lacks clarity without additional context.
Example: "A score of a hundred is required to pass the exam."
Alternatives: "a number of" or "a total of".
Exact(15)
The A.V. Club gave the episode a score of "A", saying it was a "pretty terrific [episode]...a brisk, scary, inventive adventure filled with clever concepts and witty dialogue.
Here was a score of a thorny modernist forging his own undogmatic voice from the radical currents of the day.
At a press conference, a local reporter once asked Xi to rate his performance: "Would you give yourself a score of a hundred — or a score of ninety?" (Neither, Xi said; a high number would look "boastful," and a low number would reflect "low self-esteem").
If adopted in July of 2017, Arkansas will also receive a score of A according to our rubric.
On the ERS global quality scales, a score of a 3 is considered "minimal" quality, and any score below 3 is considered inadequate quality (Harms et al., 2005).
Asking Siri to open my door sounds awesome, but I've had such a horrible experience with Siri on little things like bringing up a score of a baseball game, I can't imagine trusting it, or even thinking to ask it to unlock my doors.
Similar(45)
So long as she has smart essays, good recommendations, and a solid score on the GMAT (like the GRE for business folks), she'll be let in to Wharton and allowed to attend as long as she takes one calculus class and earns a score of A- or higher.
Thus, Score_R was a score of an accumulation of all the specificity scores of the references related to a drug-target association.
Healthy subjects had a NCT-A score of 45.1 ± 12.7 s and a DST score of 49.8 ± 9.8.
Rick Ross has a score of eighty-five; Rick Santorum has a score of eighty-two; Rick Perry has a score of sixty-six.
A score of 9.787 brought a roar from the crowd.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com