The phrase "a score for which" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific score or result that is relevant to a particular context or situation.
Example: "The team achieved a score for which they had trained tirelessly throughout the season."
Alternatives: "a score that" or "a score pertaining to".
Speaking as a composer himself, Matthews is inclined to think that destruction is the only way of ensuring that his own wishes are not abused but then, without drawing breath, he wistfully laments the terrible loss of Sibelius's Eighth Symphony by the composer's own hand - a score for which most of us would give a very great deal.
The sedation score was calculated for the 4-h period preceding the first recording, as suggested by Randolph et al. [15], using a score for which one point was given for the amount of each drug that would be equivalent to 1 h of sedation in a nontolerant subject.
These comorbidities (Alcohol use disorders, Nicotine Dependence, Mood disorders, Anxiety disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Sleep disturbances) were used in this publication to build a sum score for which a range of 0 to 6 points is possible.
It might be a film score for which the deadline was only a week away, a concert in the Royal Albert Hall with minimal rehearsal time (Hopkins was an able conductor as well as pianist and organist), or series of lectures on great choral masterworks for music societies around Britain.
For the LLSPS, scaled scores are added to give a total score, for which the maximum possible value is 3.
The Birmingham players also gave an exciting account of another early work, "Living Toys" (1993), an impish score for which Mr. Adès wrote (after the fact) a fictitious scenario about a group of Spanish men questioning a precocious child about his dreams and plans.
Lemma 2 Let M be a matrix of length m, let α and β be two score bounds defining a score range for which we want to compute the score distribution Q.
For the absolute score, while interpreting the results of a trial, one could consider the proportion of patients who achieve a given mean score for which anchors exist before and after an intervention.
We have used the random sequence pairwise score distribution to set up a score threshold, for which the observed probability in random alignments (p-value) is <10−4.
The MYMOP2 uses a 7-point score for which the minimum clinically important change in score after intervention should be between 0.5-1.0 0.5-1.0anye greater than 1.0 change considered clinically sigreaternthan1.0.
For this purpose, we considered as a potential threshold the score for which 75% of the patients in the targeted category had a value below this score.
