Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a sample was classified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to research, data analysis, or any situation where a sample is categorized or assigned to a specific group.
Example: "After thorough analysis, a sample was classified as belonging to the control group."
Alternatives: "a sample was categorized" or "a sample was designated".
Exact(14)
A sample was classified as quantifiable if two or more replicates were above the limits of detection (LOD).
A sample was classified as CFS-positive if its RQ value was greater than the calculated cut-off.
We calculated the Genomic Grade Index (GGI) of all tumors as described in [19] where a sample was classified as high risk with a GGI ≥0 and as low risk with a GGI<0.
Below this score, a sample was classified as 'Sporadic-like'.
A sample was classified as positive when more than 10% of cells were stained with the relevant mAb.
A sample was classified as having a mixture of alleles when multiple bands were present for any of the markers.
Similar(46)
This model can decrease the possibility that a sample is classified into a wrong category.
Analysis of the voting structures indicates that myoglobin, as well as tenascin C, are often used as a terminal decision point forming the final decisions on whether a sample is classified as a case or control.
By requiring SEPT9 to be present in all standard replicates or one diluted replicate before a sample is classified positive, the test achieves a very high specificity (97%) and still retains substantial sensitivity (65%).
(1) a sample is classified as normal if Parabacteroides distasonis was absent.
In all cases, positive and negative predictive values (i.e. how well a sample is classified) were larger than 0.90.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com