The phrase "a run of the protocol" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to executing or following a specific set of procedures or guidelines in a formal context, such as in technology or research.
Example: "Before we proceed with the experiment, we need to conduct a run of the protocol to ensure everything is functioning as expected."
Alternatives: "execution of the protocol" or "implementation of the protocol".
The Aliveness assertion checks the availability of the participants, e.g., the first Aliveness check Aliveness (EP, M) states that when M completes a run of the protocol, apparently with EP, then EP has previously been running the same protocol.
A stronger definition of the above Aliveness is specified by the Weak Agreement, for instance WeakAgreement (EP,M) assertion could be interpreted as follows: if M has completed a run of the protocol with EP, then EP has previously been running the protocol, apparently with M. Generally, failing to meet the WeakAgreement assertions implies the failure to meet the Aliveness ones.
The Scyther tool introduces adversaries that can compromise agents during the run of the protocol learning their keys or the random numbers generated.
The run-time of the protocol in [9] for N u > 973 users has been estimated.
The feasibility of generating the complete set of binary logic operators in this study indicates both the effectiveness (in term of generating sequences with high success rate) and the efficiency (using only one run of multiSrch) of the protocol.
Lancaster et al [ 2] list as legitimate objectives of a pilot study: sample size calculation; providing a dummy run of trial procedures/the protocol; testing data collection forms or questionnaires; testing how randomization procedures work; determining recruitment and consent rates; examining the acceptability of the intervention; and selection of the most appropriate primary outcome measure.
The fragments were amplified according to the second amplification run of the Transposon Display protocol, and cloned using the Topo TA cloning kit (Invitrogen).
To eliminate possible bias due to day-to-day differences in staining outcomes, equal numbers of epithelia from each experimental group were processed in parallel in all runs of the immunolabeling protocol.
It would be useful to develop a proof-of-concept system running the protocol to test its performance in such nonideal settings.
The proposed change may substantially reduce the demands of running the protocol to make it feasible to implement on very inexpensive machines and slow-speed links.
DAG, RUN, NS, DRT, GL and RUN will implement the protocol and oversee collection of the data.
