The phrase "a ruling stating" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a formal decision or judgment that includes specific information or directives.
Example: "The court issued a ruling stating that the evidence was inadmissible in the trial."
Alternatives: "a decision indicating" or "a judgment declaring".
On December 22nd it asked a federal court for a ruling stating that a French court cannot hold an American-based company accountable for breaking French law.
Hours before the sentencing hearing, Gardephe issued a ruling stating that it was appropriate for him to consider all of the $275m in profits and avoided losses made both by Martoma and his former boss.
Finally, the Home Office brought in a ruling stating that any Kolpak player had to have a valid work visa for a four year period to qualify as an EU citizen.
In 1888 Grover Cleveland, then president of America, arbitrated in the dispute and gave a ruling stating that Costa Rica had the right to use the river for commerce but "has not the right of navigation of the river San Juan with vessels of war".
On Wednesday, he issued a ruling stating that the payment only applies to new settlements, and that the 6 percent will be calculated from the net amount of the settlement after withholding for liens and other obligations, not from the gross amount.
Lind issued a ruling stating that she hopes to keep the government's testimony on the alleged damage the leaks caused as narrow as possible during the phase of the trial where she is determining Manning's guilt.
After weeks of being blocked, Twitter will soon be accessible in the country following a court ruling stating that the ban was a breach of freedom of expression.
He was incredulous that in light of such a ruling, state laws could get this far.
On Tuesday the US International Trade Commission issued a preliminary ruling stating that the firm's iPhones had infringed a patent for eliminating noise and other interference during calls, held by Motorola Mobility.
Today, the EU's General Court upheld a previous ruling stating that the word was simply too well known.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., reversed that decision in a 2-1 ruling, stating that Apple's injunction does not want to ban the devices from the marketplace and the patented features can be removed without a product recall.
