a robust right to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a robust right to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing legal rights, entitlements, or privileges that are strong and well-established. Example: "Every citizen has a robust right to free speech, which is protected by the constitution."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

He worries that a robust right to be forgotten could throw off the pursuit.

The New Yorker

According to these background theological commitments, rejection of a robust right to religious freedom is essential to social harmony and communal flourishing.

SEP

Were we to ask Qutb whether he would have reasons to support laws that protect a robust right to religious freedom if he were adequately informed and reasonable, surely he would say: no.

SEP

In short, Qutb articulates what is, from his point of view, a compelling theological rationale against any law that authorizes the state to protect a robust right to religious freedom.

SEP

The establishment of a robust right to rule depends on the fact that each citizen rightly takes as a reason for obedience that it has a moral duty owed to the authority.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

A more robust right to rule includes a duty owed to the authority on the part of the subjects not to interfere with the activities of the authority.

SEP

If each person has robust rights to participate in debate and decision making and each person's views are given a reasonable hearing, it is not clear why equality requires more.

SEP

We don't have a robust rights culture.

The Guardian - Opinion

We all know, from the Citizens United decision two years ago, that corporations have a robust First Amendment right to spend as much as they want on politics, a right they are exercising to the hilt in the current election season.

The New York Times

A divided Court upheld the trial judge's preclusion of the witness, adding a new framework for balancing a defendant's right to a robust defense with a series of other factors.

Wikipedia

In theory, the "undue burden" standard could have provided a fairly robust protection of a woman's right to choose to have an abortion; in practice, it has not.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a robust right to", ensure that the context clearly indicates what actions or entitlements this right enables. Provide specific details to highlight the strength and extent of the right.

Common error

Avoid using "a robust right to" when the right in question is actually limited or contested. Ensure that the evidence supports the claim of the right's strength and enforceability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a robust right to" functions as a noun phrase that introduces a legal or ethical entitlement. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and indicates that the subject has a strong entitlement. Examples show it protecting religious freedom or a defendant's rights.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "a robust right to" is a grammatically correct and usable expression, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, to highlight a strong and well-supported entitlement. While it appears relatively infrequently, it's primarily found in News & Media and Scientific sources, suggesting its suitability for formal and analytical contexts. When using the phrase, ensure the right's 'robustness' is accurate and contextually relevant. Consider "a strong claim to" or "a solid entitlement to" as possible alternatives to maintain semantic precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a firmly established entitlement to

Highlights the long-standing nature and secure grounding of the entitlement, emphasizing its deep roots.

a solid entitlement to

Emphasizes the firm and reliable nature of the entitlement, focusing on its established foundation.

a protected entitlement to

Focuses on the safeguarding and defense of the entitlement, portraying the right as shielded from infringement.

a strong claim to

Highlights the legitimacy and forcefulness of the claim, suggesting a right that is difficult to challenge.

a recognized liberty to

Emphasizes the acknowledgment and acceptance of the liberty, indicating a right that is officially sanctioned.

a guaranteed access to

Focuses on the assurance of being able to utilize or benefit from something, portraying the right as a secure pathway.

a well-founded freedom to

Highlights the established basis for the freedom, underscoring the right's legitimacy and justification.

a definitive privilege to

Stresses the clear and unambiguous nature of the privilege, indicating a right that is clearly defined and granted.

an unassailable prerogative to

Stresses the indisputable nature of the prerogative, presenting the right as immune to doubt or attack.

a substantial guarantee of

Emphasizes the considerable assurance provided, highlighting the significant level of security associated with the right.

FAQs

How can I use "a robust right to" in a sentence?

Use "a robust right to" when you want to emphasize that someone has a strong and well-supported entitlement. For example: "Citizens have "a robust right to free speech"."

What are some alternatives to saying "a robust right to"?

Alternatives include "a solid entitlement to", "a strong claim to", or "a guaranteed access to". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it always appropriate to describe a right as "robust"?

No, it's important to ensure that the right you're describing is genuinely strong and well-protected. If the right is limited or contested, it may be misleading to call it "robust". Consider whether "a qualified right to" might be more suitable.

What's the difference between "a robust right to" and "a basic right to"?

"A basic right to" implies a fundamental entitlement, whereas "a robust right to" suggests a stronger, better-protected version of that right. A robust right is not easily infringed upon or challenged, whereas a basic right may have limitations or be subject to interpretation. It might be useful in certain contexts to claim "an inalienable right to" instead.