The phrase "a risk governance process" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing frameworks or systems designed to manage and mitigate risks within an organization or project.
Example: "Implementing a risk governance process is essential for ensuring that potential threats are identified and addressed proactively."
Alternatives: "a risk management framework" or "a risk oversight procedure".
A function is used to denote what a specific system does, or needs to do, to achieve the purpose of a risk governance process.
The purpose of a risk governance process answers the question why it exists, or why it should be introduced, while the form denotes how the functions are, or should be, carried out in practice.
On the one hand it addresses the problem of understanding and explaining a risk governance process (descriptive approach) and, on the other hand, the problem of constructing, or improving it (normative approach).
Framed within that infrastructure, recent cases including L'Aquila are used to identify those parts of a social risk governance process that lead to managerial risks.
The framework is especially useful as a basis for identifying problems related to a fragmentation of the risk governance process in contexts involving multiple stakeholders.
The usefulness of the design perspective is exemplified in two cases, and the findings from both of these cases indicate a fragmentation of the risk governance process.
Furthermore, risk communication is seen now as an activity that is transverse to the risk governance process as a whole.
In addition, and central to the risk governance process, communication is cited as an important companion to all phases.
The article will address the question of how stakeholder involvement can best be integrated into the risk governance process.
The article describes these requirements and explains the formats that have been tested for providing this input to the risk governance process.
Based on extensive dialogue with stakeholders from the CEM regions over the last two years the paper develops recommendations for inclusive and participatory risk governance process.
