"a rigorous argument" is a correct phrase and it is commonly used in written English.
It means a strong and logical set of reasons or facts that support a particular idea or conclusion. Example: The lawyer presented a rigorous argument to prove his client's innocence, citing multiple witness testimonies and physical evidence.
But in this article, at any rate, he displays the virtues of his philosophical training and presents a rigorous argument.
His was not a rigorous argument, but aesthetic considerations are not to be ignored in the history of science.
Then there was the inquiry's own report, which presented a well-written record of the evidence reviewed and a rigorous argument that supported the conclusion.
In addition, a rigorous argument is used to establish that it is generally impossible to build an IC-compliant monce once a least-squares model is not, thus emphasizing the importance of design of experiments for IC-compliant model identification.
The homework problems that generated the most confusion among my students were not particularly long, complicated, or computationally arduous; rather, the difficult problems were the ones which involved formulating a rigorous argument.
This may provide a moment of relief in the course of a rigorous argument (as in the last movement of Mozart's Piano Sonata in C Major, K 330 [1781–83]); or it may allow the composer to expand the scope of a large-scale movement (as in the first movement of Beethoven's Symphony No. 3 in E-flat Major [1803; Eroica]).
"The trend is toward treating this like cryptography, where 'I scrambled up the data a bunch' is not a valid argument and 'I can't think of an attack' is not a valid argument – you have to have a technically rigorous argument that no attack is possible".
This suggests that Leibniz is not trying to provide a fully rigorous argument for the existence of simple substances or a full explanation of the relation between monads and bodies in the Monadologie or the Principes de la Nature et de la Grace.
In 1934, he published a collection of writings called "The Curse of Bigness," but it does not make a sustained, rigorous argument.
Spe Salvi is not pious prattle, as some would like to dismiss it, but a philosophically rigorous argument that revives the theme Pope Benedict advanced in his famous speech at the University of Regensburg in 2006: that the Enlightenment's rupture of faith and reason is the most fundamental explanation for civilisation's descent into hopelessness.
Finally, we would like to express our gratitude to L. Pecora, for insisting in presenting a more rigorous argument concerning the calculation of the conditional exponents.
