The phrase "a rigorous appraisal" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a thorough and detailed evaluation or assessment of something, such as a project, performance, or situation.
Example: "The committee conducted a rigorous appraisal of the proposed budget to ensure all expenses were justified."
Alternatives: "a thorough evaluation" or "a detailed assessment."
November 30, 1637 Paris, France January 10 , 1698Tillemont, France Sébastien Le Nain de Tillemont, in full Louis-Sébastien Le Nain de Tillemont (born Nov. 30, 1637, Paris, France died Jan . 10 , 1698Tillemont) French ecclesiastical historian who was one of the earliest scholars to provide a rigorous appraisal of preceding historical writing.
An integral component of the review process was a rigorous appraisal of the methodological quality of published CPW evaluations.
In addition, the quality of the research in the area is still needed of a rigorous appraisal [ 46].
An integral component of the review process was a rigorous appraisal of the study designs and methodological quality of all relevant CPW evaluations.
Global health partners should promote both a rigorous appraisal of experiences and a frank dialogue on what has been shown to work and not work in different settings.
A rigorous appraisal of the included studies was performed and the transparency and reproducibility of this review is supported by its adherence to STROBE requirements 25 and the PRISMA statement.
As a first step, we presented a prototype how to prepare such a scientifically rigorous appraisal tool specifically developed for pharmaceutical technologies based on the quality assessment of economic evaluations in previous reimbursement dossiers.
Judge Robert Martin, president of the social entitlement chamber of the first tier tribunal told the committee that introducing MR would be justified only if it led to a more rigorous appraisal of fit-for-work decisions.
The TLRI did not conduct an independent rigorous appraisal of the substantial medical literature on the topic of infant male circumcision, but confined itself to legal aspects.
While consideration of a broad range of study designs presents methodological challenges for systematic reviews of the literature, the method described here presents a means for rigorous appraisal of the internal and external validity of the included studies.
The result will disappoint anyone looking for a rigorous, comprehensive appraisal of Winogrand's work, which, as Dyer points out, can be found elsewhere.
