The phrase "a right to representation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing legal rights, political representation, or advocacy for individuals or groups.
Example: "Every citizen has a right to representation in government, ensuring their voices are heard in the decision-making process."
Alternatives: "entitlement to representation" or "right to be represented".
Now it had a more precise sense: it was an entity with an identifiable body of demesmen and a right to representation in the Council.
"Either approach serves to undermine the principle that the client has a right to representation, however unpopular or unattractive the cause may appear to be.
Required police to inform suspects in custody of their right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used against them and that they have a right to representation by a lawyer before interrogation.
The framers were conscious that if you live in this country, if you work and pay taxes, you have certain rights, including a right to representation, and you don't have to be a citizen.
In the midst of the fight over Atos Origin, he said that the hedge funds had a right to representation on the firm's board, given the size of their stake.
The feeling against advocacy in the criminal law was so strong that, at least in cases involving more serious kinds of crime, a right to representation by a trained advocate was nowhere generally recognized until the 18th century.
In 1962, Baker v. Carr elucidated the doctrine while limiting it, holding that despite the seemingly political nature of legal challenges to legislative districts and voter representation, voters held a justiciable right to representation in the House of Representatives on a numerically equal basis as voters in other districts.
As such, under American labor law, employees have a legal right to representation to bargain collectively over some of the circumstances of that employment.
** There is no question that a due process right to representation is placed at issue here, since at least one of the claimants who retained respondent received benefits that the Government was seeking to recover as erroneously paid.
L. 100 690, §§ 6182, 6184, substituted "in section 1956(c)(5) of this title" for "for the purposes of subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31" and inserted ", but such term does not include any transaction necessary to preserve a person's right to representation as guaranteed by the sixth amendment to the Constitution".
However, Ms Ainsworth has more than 200 examples of situations where a suspect has lost the right to representation because of using indirect speech.
