The phrase "a review of documentation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of examining or evaluating written materials or records for accuracy, completeness, or compliance.
Example: "The team conducted a review of documentation to ensure all procedures were followed correctly."
Alternatives: "an assessment of documents" or "an evaluation of records."
"Based on a review of documentation and interviews, the inspector general's office determined the CIA's cooperation with filmmakers Mark Boal and Kathryn Bigelow began in 2010 when Panetta and Bigelow met at an event where Bigelow discussed her film project 'Tora Bora,' a film project involving the CIA's failure to capture [bin Laden], and Panetta offered the Agency's assistance".
A review of documentation found that all 4 types had been produced by ISM from 1975 through 1988.
In addition, a mapping was conducted for 57 countries which were on record as either having an active partnership or some UNGEI‐led activities, as well as conducting interviews with global stakeholders, and undertaking a review of documentation.
Each case study combined a review of documentation with interviews and field work, and in order to enable follow-through analysis from programme intentions to the results observed, each employed a number of mini-case studies of specific incidences of upstream work in UNICEF's education portfolio.
We evaluated the completeness of nursing documentation by a review of nursing documentation.
The company, based in Marlborough, Mass., also said that it had set up a special committee of the board to oversee a review of the documentation on options.
The group also revealed it was putting aside £71m relating to new consumer credit legislation after a review of its documentation and processes uncovered "a small number of areas which require further inquiry".
The tax credit amounts are subject to change pending an audit and a review of final documentation supplied at the end of production.
The decision follows an appeals court inquiry into the email controversy that involved interviews with Cebull and others and a review of "voluminous" documentation, including emails, Kozinski said.
A review of relevant documentation identifies a high degree of consistency between the UNICEF-supported SCCFS Programme in South Africa and CFS programmes in other countries.
