Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "a return on assets" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in financial contexts to refer to the profitability of a company relative to its total assets.
Example: "The company's return on assets has improved significantly over the past year, indicating better efficiency in using its assets to generate profit."
Alternatives: "asset return" or "return generated from assets".
Exact(18)
The company has very little debt, he said, and a return on assets of 28percentt.
To take a comparison: China's biggest bank, Industrial & Commercial Bank, reported a return on assets in 1995 of just 0.42%.
It recorded a $1 billion profit last year and had a return on assets near the top of its industry.
Britain's HSBC, similar in asset size, boasted a return on assets of 1.62%.Even these official statistics grossly overstate the banks' profitability.
These projects now account for a quarter of the firm's assets (excluding the finance arm), and last year made a return on assets of about zero.
That reintroduces some administrative burden, but avoids supporting the idle.A better system might also be financed by a return on assets, rather than by taxes.
Similar(42)
But for the industry to attract private capital, it will need to generate a return on its assets.
He required, for example, that firms had a positive return on assets and a positive cash flow from operations for the most recent fiscal year.
For example, the method I base on his approach requires companies to have a positive return on assets and a positive cash flow from operations for the most recent fiscal year.
Joseph Piotroski: One of the worlds largest steel companies, Korea-based Posco, is a favorite of this strategy because it has a good return on assets, positive cash flow from operations, a declining long term debt-to-assets ratio, a rising current ratio and improving gross margins.
Businesses helmed by an exec with a positive character score saw an average return on assets of 9.35percentt over a two-year span.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com