The phrase "a result of process" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be "a result of a process" to be grammatically accurate.
Example: "The findings were a result of a process that took several months to complete."
Alternatives: "an outcome of the process" or "a consequence of the process."
The host NT undergoes deformation due to the loss of carbon atoms as a result of process 2 (indicated with red arrow, Fig. 4b).
As a result of process changes, the heat recovery systems may operate in conditions far from the original design point, creating a significant potential for energy efficiency improvement.
Structural and textural properties of extruded corn and corn lentil mixtures were investigated as a result of process conditions, including extrusion temperature (170 230 °C), feed rate (2.52 6.84 kg/h) and feed moisture content (13 19% wb).
The use of a formal language permits us to verify that the specifications possess certain correctness properties, namely that the responsibilities assigned to roles are fulfilled, and that constraints are maintained as a result of process execution.
In the 2005 book "Wooden on Leadership," guard Gail Goodrich recalled, "He believed that winning is a result of process, and he was a master of the process, of getting us to focus on what we were doing rather than the final score.
Current estimates put the cost of goods for aP antigens produced with traditional methods at about US$0.25 to $1 per dose, compared with about US$0.10 per dose for wP, as a result of process improvements and changes in the marketpace.
One of the reasons behind this is related to the uncertainties, as a result of process-induced defects, in the mechanical performance of the laminates.
These bubbles grow as a result of processes of coagulation and coalescence and simultaneously they are floating up.
To what extent the divergent plastid genome of K. veneficum is a result of processes associated with adaptation of the new endosymbiont to an evolutionary mosaics of the plastid-targeted genome, remains to be investigated.
Reads less than 100 bp did not yield useable data and were usually a result of process-related failure modes.
Figure 4 shows 62.4% of reads with Q20<100 bp fail as a result of process-related problems while 75.5% of reads in the Q20: 500–599 bp bin fail due to template-related characteristics.
