The phrase "a restrictive provision" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal, contractual, or regulatory contexts to refer to a clause or condition that limits or constrains certain actions or rights.
Example: "The contract includes a restrictive provision that prevents the employee from working for competitors for two years after leaving the company."
Alternatives: "limiting clause" or "restrictive clause".
That reduction was largely a result of a more restrictive provision regarding food benefits tied to heating and cooling allowances.
Democratic leaders want a less restrictive provision that would require insurance companies to segregate federal money from private premiums, which could be used to purchase plans that cover abortion.
He said the restrictive provision "represents a dangerous and unprecedented challenge to critical executive branch authority to determine when and where to prosecute Guantánamo detainees, based on the facts and the circumstances of each case and our national security interests".
Abortion providers and women's rights groups will ask the US supreme court to consider Texas's anti-abortion powers after federal appellate court on Tuesday upheld the most restrictive provisions of a law that could leave the second largest state in the US with fewer than 10 abortion clinics.
Conservative gun rights groups see any new restrictions enacted as potentially leading to just more restrictive provisions, but I have talked to more than a couple avid hunters who are very much in favor of more restrictive access to guns, because they know that horrific events like what occurred in Connecticut do not help their cause.
The court did not deem any of the law's other restrictive provisions — including counselling on the dangers of abortion, a twenty-four-hour waiting period, and parental permission for minors — unduly burdensome.
Mr. Lazio made no mention of those restrictive provisions when he outlined what he described as a "bold" idea to the Chamber of Commerce in Amherst, N.Y., on Aug. 24, and there was no mention of it in the detailed briefing papers his campaign provided about the plan that day.
The administration is, however, now trying to revive the programme.Mr Obama did not endorse any of these restrictive provisions, but his inability to stop them suggests a deference to protectionists and an unwillingness to spend political capital in defence of free trade.
The best way for that to happen is for Goldman to relinquish its status as a bank holding company and free itself of the most onerous and restrictive provisions of the new law.
