Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a restricted audience" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific group of people who are limited in number or who have specific qualifications to access certain information or content.
Example: "The presentation was designed for a restricted audience, consisting only of industry experts and stakeholders."
Alternatives: "a limited audience" or "an exclusive audience."
Exact(7)
Her original remarks to a restricted audience in Yorkshire — before the Manchester bombing this week raised grislier challenges — drew reactions that showed the somber depths of passions associated with a debate that consumed much energy in the Labour administration of Tony Blair.
Why such a restricted audience?
Unlike the claim that the Laozi espouses a mystical or esoteric teaching directed at a restricted audience, this view tends to highlight its universal appeal and contemporary relevance.
On the other hand, when he is teaching an online course with a restricted audience, then he will use a different online meeting tool that gives him more control.
Despite being part of a wave of offbeat films that mostly failed to make an impact at the box office, it drew public attention upon its release, which led to a commercial success among a restricted audience targeted by a selective release in twenty cities.
Conversely, it is possible that primary research articles may prove relatively more popular in specialist journals that cater to a restricted audience.
Similar(53)
This meant showing stories beyond the usual restricted audience of initiated men, so they removed sensitive elements or camouflaged them with carefully placed dots.
This policy, along with the local broadcast and restricted audience size, was intended to avoid the dreaded clash of stu-dents and VFW and Legion marchers.
If we see a domestic opening north of $70 million, however, and early overseas totals exceed expectations despite the restricted audience, then I'll be inclined to think it might head toward a cume north of $550 million.
But that's just one more reason Weigel should have published these opinions and observations in Right Now instead of segregating them for the restricted audience of Journolist.
"It's a restricted market.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com