The phrase "a repeated presentation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a presentation that is given multiple times or in a recurring manner.
Example: "The conference will feature a repeated presentation on the latest advancements in renewable energy technologies."
Alternatives: "a recurring presentation" or "a repeated display".
In the third experiment, 5 month-olds were shown a repeated presentation adapted from the "Partial-Lag" design.
For example, in a repeated presentation of auditory or visual stimuli, an unexpected object of equivalent duration appears to last longer.
Similarly, when an oddball stimulus appears midstream in a repeated presentation of stimuli (auditory or visual), the judged duration of the oddball is overestimated by up to 50% [11], [12].
This experiment was similar to experiment 4 but consisted of randomly interleaved trials that either involved (a) a repeated presentation of the number 1 five times, (b) the sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or (c) a 'scrambled' sequence that began with 1 and did not have 2 in its second position (such as 1, 4, 3, 5, 2).
"As a result of repeated presentation, the subjects developed enhanced sensitivity to the dots," he said.
Extinction, which itself is a learning process, is induced by the repeated presentation of a conditioned stimulus in the absence of a previously associated unconditioned stimulus, resulting in the elimination of a previously elicited response.
In this sense, any feeding act is a response to the environment, but it is not a simple "reflex". On repeated presentation of the same food situation, the individual sometimes shows the appropriate response but at other times will fail to do so.
What is common throughout these studies is that repeated presentation of a stimulus results in a reduction of neuronal responding.
After a conditioned stimulus (CS) has been paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US), repeated presentation of the CS alone leads to a loss of conditioned fear response.
The entrenchment hypothesis (Braine & Brooks, 1995) states that repeated presentation of a verb leads to an ever-increasing probabilistic inference that non-attested uses (e.g., * I'm gonna fall this on her) are not permitted.
We used this adaptation paradigm as a means to test the hypothesis that the perception of male and female voices is carried out by overlapping neuronal populations: in that case, the repeated presentation of a male voice would be combined with a reduction of the response signal and a "recovery from adaptation" would be observed for a subsequently presented female voice.
