The phrase "a relevant standard" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing criteria or benchmarks that are applicable to a particular context or situation.
Example: "In order to ensure quality, we must adhere to a relevant standard in our manufacturing processes."
Alternatives: "an applicable benchmark" or "a pertinent criterion".
We also note that in order to use the gloves, the user is required to adhere to the standard Touch Typing method in terms of finger placement and key assignments, which we include as a relevant standard necessary for this project.
As an action-guiding notion, it must make use of a relevant standard of proof.
These will then be mapped to appropriate databases to look for evidence of improvement over accreditation cycles or following the introduction of a relevant standard.
Searching for the ideal way to present the evaluation results with an illustrative benchmark that makes sense without being able to provide a relevant standard for the outcome of a patient evaluation will probably also in the future be an ongoing struggle.
In the end, it is the FAA that will decide whether a plane has complied with all relevant standards and therefore is deserving of certification.
This project did not have any relevant standards, as communication only occurred via a signal in the auditory range.
When a paper lacks a CI or the relevant standard error, one option is to contact the authors.
However, B-ALL is a heterogeneous disease, and therapeutically relevant standard and high-risk group categories (SR and HR) have been defined according to characteristics at diagnosis (age, white blood-cell counts, central nervous system involvement, and cytogenetic abnormalities of the leukemia cell clone).
However, in recall-oriented domains such as patent search where there is a significant cost of missing a relevant document, standard IR effectiveness measurement only reveals part of the truth.
In seven studies (N = 1,566), we find that people look to others who are above-average as a benchmark for social comparison (Studies 1A an 1B), that "the average person" is not even considered a relevant low standard of comparison, and that despite perceiving themselves as better than average, people don't see themselves as better than their self-chosen standards of comparison (Study 2).
For each measurement, a relevant physiological standard was established, to which the cervical spine ROM results were referred [ 15].
