The phrase "a relevant conclusion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the outcome of an argument, research, or analysis that is pertinent to the topic at hand.
Example: "After reviewing the data, we arrived at a relevant conclusion that supports our initial hypothesis."
Alternatives: "an appropriate conclusion" or "a significant conclusion".
Thus, a relevant conclusion is that the well-known28 Rich-club effect observed in ATNs is exclusively related to the presence of major airlines.
A relevant conclusion in this work is that the addition of fibers to the cementitious matrix improves concrete fracture energy release capacity not only under room temperature condition, but also under moderate and high temperature.
We believe this is a relevant conclusion since it applies the findings accumulated over the past 30 years from the studies of electron transfer reactions on short DNA oligomers to the field of human cancer biology.
The Conclusion section could be a specifically labelled section, a paragraph of the Discussion clearly listing conclusions, or presented as a box: where there was no such section missing was coded not the absence of a relevant conclusion.
A relevant conclusion in their article was that cefpodoxime, ceftibuten, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid were the most likely antimicrobials to achieve optimal in vivo exposures in children with H. influenzae infections.
(2015) would absorb too many degrees of freedom to allow us to draw any relevant conclusion from them.
These unexpected health differences could be spurious and any relevant conclusion should be considered as preliminary.
1) As a rationale for the study and also a clinically relevant conclusion, the authors point to a recent GWAS study showing linkage disequilibrium to a specific single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and hence indicating the possibility that the linkage could be a result of deletion of CFHR3/CFHR1.
1) As a rationale for the study and also a clinically relevant conclusion, the authors point to a recent GWAS study showing linkage disequilibrium to a specific SNP and hence indicating the possibility that the linkage could be a result of deletion of CFHR3/CFHR1.
In other words, a functional imaging study of healthy participants predicted functional specialisation that was confirmed with a neuropsychological (structural imaging) study of patients, which led to a clinically relevant conclusion.
(For you mathematicians out there, yes, I had many loans to make it a statistically relevant conclusion).
