Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a relevant agreement" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to an agreement that is applicable or significant to a particular situation or context.
Example: "Before proceeding with the negotiations, we need to review a relevant agreement that outlines the terms of our partnership."
Alternatives: "an applicable agreement" or "a pertinent agreement".
Exact(2)
The theory is then compared with experimental and numerical results, showing a relevant agreement.
The EU must place the issue of personal data protection where it belongs - in a relevant agreement or in the TTIP.
Similar(58)
Perhaps some agent or force is causing the two sources to agree even though what they agree on is false; perhaps there is a common cause that explains the relevant agreement.
She said calculating the market salary rate for an overseas worker by reference to a relevant enterprise agreement would help ensure Australian wages and conditions were not undercut in the 457 visa regime.
But the most relevant agreement is the first climate treaty, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which was signed in 1992 by Mr. Bush's father and approved unanimously by the Senate.
Experimental data on PZT capacitors show relevant agreement with the model for both saturated and minor loops.
The relevant agreement for Rawls is among "reasonable" fellow citizens living within the boundaries of a specific society, who are already interested in justice and accept the burdens and standards of cooperation (O'Neill 2003a,b; cf. Brink 1989, 303 321; 1987).
But for DTN, some nodes considering their own resource usage [19] may refuse to the data delivery request from other nodes, or some nodes do not obey the rules of the relevant agreement.
The FOUR score performed better than the GCS for exact inter-rater agreement, but not for the clinically more relevant agreement within the range of ± 1 score point.
The FOUR score, a new coma scale not relying on verbal response, performs better as the GCS with regard to exact inter-rater agreement, but not for the clinically more relevant agreement within the range of ± 1 score point.
None of the presented methods was fully able to satisfactorily capture the theoretically and clinically relevant agreement between physicians and patients that was shown in simple cross tabulations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com