The phrase "a relatively small standard" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a benchmark or criterion that is considered minor or limited in scope compared to others.
Example: "In this industry, we often work with a relatively small standard for quality control, which allows for more flexibility in production."
Alternatives: "a modest standard" or "a minor standard".
In contrast, the a priori CER has a relatively small standard deviation because CERs obtained from passive remote sensing are in limited ranges (Hong et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2016).
A relatively small standard deviation of ~2% is observed for the classification accuracy.
The "normal" subpopulation has mean birth weight in the normal birth weight range, 3169-3509 grand, and a relatively small standard deviation in birth weight, 455-474 grams.
In previous studies on dogs and cats, time to peak was characterized by a relatively small standard deviation: in 11 dogs the standard deviation was of 20 seconds (mean 34.6 seconds) and in 10 cats the standard deviations was of 2.9 seconds (mean 9,6 seconds) [ 36, 38].
However, despite this basal difference, the increase was fairly constant within a specific zinc or cadmium treatment, as demonstrated by the relatively small standard deviations obtained in the different biological replicates.
Interestingly, the factor-specific mean scores show consistency within a factor grouping, with hospitals having relatively similar absolute mean scores and relatively small standard deviations in all cases.
For this data with its relatively small standard error (typically ± 2 to 3%% of the inspired concentration), this should be a reasonably accurate assumption.
Nevertheless, the mean statistics for the rank and VAS data show relatively small standard errors of the mean, and the mean values for the set of health states show a clear overall pattern.
In this study, the advantageously consistent property of the solid polyurethane foam was reflected in the relatively small standard deviations in pullout strength, which were less than 7% of mean values (Table 2).
The ability of GPCR dimers and oligomers to associate and dissociate rapidly suggests relatively small standard free energy differences between dimeric and monomeric GPCRs compared to those of protein complexes stabilized by multiple specific bonds.
A difference of 1.4 on the HDRS is a relatively small difference (0.4 standard deviations) and any difference smaller than this we regard as clinically insignificant.
