The phrase "a relative low response" is not correct in English.
It should be "a relatively low response." You can use it when discussing a response that is lower in comparison to others or to a standard.
Example: "The survey showed a relatively low response rate compared to previous years."
Alternatives: "a comparatively low response" or "a lower response rate."
The SnO2/Au-doped In2O3 CS NFs sensor exhibited a high response to acetone at 300 °C, whereas Au-doped In2O3 NFs sensor showed a relative low response to acetone at 300 °C.
Indeed, Börsch-Supan et al. [7] explain that in some waves there are a relative low response rates and moderate levels of attrition (even though the overall response rate is high compared to other European and US surveys4) which are due to the economic crisis faced by some countries, implying a decrease in the participation rates.
Limitations of this study include our reliance on self-reported CRC screening use, coverage bias in traditional telephone surveys of low-income population, and a relative low response rate of the BRFSS survey (58.5%).
As animal skin glue seems to be absent in all cases, the findings indicate that these paintings have a relatively low response to relative humidity fluctuations.
A relatively low response rate (49 pct).
To extend the candidate gene list of the overlapping ER-stress and osmotic signal responses, we used a relative low stringency cutoff criterion for variation in expression (close to a 2-fold change in expression level).
The relative low clinical response rate in our population probably reflects the fact that these patients represent the most severe and refractory subset among our cohort, with several of them having failed multiple biologic therapies.
Other investigators demonstrated an association of relative eosinophilia with low response to ACTH [ 8, 12, 13, 24].
Additionally, the optimal sensor exhibits a quite low response of approximately 2.2 to a high relative humidity of 80%.
Furthermore, relative statistics are unitless, which hides the fact that a low response rate remains very low even when scaled up by a seemingly large effect; by contrast, the risk difference retains the units of the measurement scale, showing that a difference between low response rates is itself very small.
