The phrase "a relative judgment" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing assessments or evaluations that depend on comparisons or context rather than absolute standards.
Example: "In this case, a relative judgment is necessary to determine the best candidate for the position based on their experience compared to others."
Alternatives: "contextual assessment" or "comparative evaluation".
In the second half Argentina continued to dominate yet this is a relative judgment as any entertainment remained tame.
The bad news is that it's a relative judgment, because the downturn of the last two years was terrible.
"We're not making a relative judgment about whether you're going to drop down dead if you eat at these places," she explains.
For screening purposes to inform retention of the module in future versions of the app, Bayes factors were also calculated for a smaller effect to permit a relative judgment, reflecting a reduction of 3 units per week (d = 0.13).
But what we shouldn't do is allow a relative judgment (maybe it's better in this way but worse in that way) to distract us from the big picture, because what's still in the bill from before is even more important than what has changed.
Therefore, relying on a relative judgment strategy in this situation provides no diagnostic information to the witness.
"The Confession" is certainly one of the better and more ambitious dramas to have launched on the Internet, but that is, as of yet, an especially relative judgment.
Our evidence suggests that continuous evidence meaningfully mediates simultaneous lineup decisions and that according to a dual-process implementation, a version of relative judgment theory that relies on a discrete recollective process should be coupled with a continuous diagnostic relative-judgment process.5.5
This evidence, which is contrary to a version of relative judgment theory that has gained a lot of traction in the legal community, compels reassessment of the role that guessing plays in eyewitness identification.
Moreover, while this is a type of relative judgment task, it differs from previous designs (Mateeff & Gourevich, 1983; Müsseler & van der Heijden, 2004; Müsseler et al., 1999) in which localization judgments were made relative to a comparison object or landmark present within the display.
This case brings up painful memories — and a question about the relative judgment of children and adults.
