The phrase "a relation when" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing conditions or circumstances related to a relationship or connection.
Example: "There is a relation when the variables are directly proportional to each other."
Alternatives: "a connection when" or "a relationship when".
Selz's complex completion resembles the "eduction of correlates" that the British psychologist Charles E. Spearman saw as a primary constituent of intellectual functioning, its complement being "eduction of relations"—that is, recognition of a relation when two elements are presented.
A good deal of evidence demonstrates how judgments of co-variation are biased through illusory correlation [ 74], whereby the individual who expects a relationship between the two variables tends to overestimate the magnitude of any relation that might exist or even infers a relation when none exists.
For example, a semantic relation is more important than a geometric relation when determining whether the robot is approaching an object or is about to collide with that object.
Including crack propagation under mixed loading, all the data tend to merge a single relation when correlated to total energy-release-rate range divided by Young's modulus, ΔGtotal/Eθ.
We found a similar relation when we analysed the connection between disease activity, CRP and anti-CSC IgM concentrations.
None of these genes appeared to show a consistent relation when studied in large populations [ 215– 218] The genetic associations with the already known major genes, CFH and ARMS2, remained without a doubt considerable; risks were increased up to 10 15 times for individuals homozygous for both risk variants.
Finally, the correlation coefficients of R for the SSA, NC, and PG reveal a different causality relation when compared with those of X, which are defined by: r NC PG ~ r SSA NC × r SSA PG.
The general theory suggests a dose-response relation: when Wales perform particularly well, the expected number of papal deaths increases.
Further stratification revealed an even stronger relation; when considering only women with BMI > 30 with one AC compared with none, we found an OR of 1.48 (95% CI 1.08 2.03) and among those with BMI > 32 an OR of 1.60 (95% CI 1.02 2.49).
The experimental points, in good agreement with our model, show a small deviation that can be explained by a slightly underestimated period P involved or a too simple SP dispersion relation when considering the patterned surface.
These authors reported an even stronger inverse relation when comparing current smokers with never smokers (OR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.4, 0.6).
