Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Hence F is a relatedness coefficient.
Therefore, we repeated the relatedness analysis without Myrt3 and obtained a relatedness coefficient of 0.66 ± 0.05.
a) In the IMSGC dataset, a relatedness coefficient R1 was defined for each couple at each variant as a ratio of probabilities of identity in state R1 = (Qc -Qm)/(1 -Qm), where Qc is the proportion of identical variants between the two spouses and Qm is the mean proportion of identical variants in the sample (an average over all possible pairs).
Similar(57)
First, a low average relatedness coefficient within a matriline indicates that the matriline is composed of a greater proportion of distant kin dyads than close kin dyads.
Both types of instability could originate from a low average relatedness coefficient among members of a matriline.
The maximum relatedness coefficient within a distance class was 0.044±0.004 for females (between 320 480 m) and 0.069±0.009 for males (between 160 320 m).
We used these data to calculate, for each pair of adult females, the Li's relatedness coefficient in SPAGeDi, a dyadic genetic similarity score [ 34, 35].
The correlation between the degree of separation between individuals, measured by the shortest paths between pairs of individuals in a social network of 156 manakins, and their relatedness coefficient was evaluated.
Further analyses confirmed no subsequent loss of genetic diversity from 18 dph through to harvest, as measured by effective population size, inbreeding rates, number of alleles, allelic richness, observed and expected heterozygosities and Rxy relatedness coefficient.
Li's average relatedness coefficient (r) between pairs of females and pairs of males were −0.0005±0.002 and −0.009±0.005 (mean±SE), respectively.
The average within-family relatedness coefficient varied from 0.35 (A535) to 0.66 (and7), and the between-family relatedness coefficient varied between 0.22 and 0.50 (File S4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com