The phrase "a related finding" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing research results or observations that are connected to a particular topic or study.
Example: "In addition to the main results, a related finding was that participants who exercised regularly reported higher levels of happiness."
Alternatives: "a connected discovery" or "an associated result".
The ruling followed a related finding by the Virginia Supreme Court last year, meaning the case could affect how long — if at all — Virginia police can keep license plate data.
A major attempt to replicate the original studies failed, and one of the researchers has admitted: "I do not believe that 'power pose' effects are real". A related finding – that merely fixing a smile on your face can make you more upbeat – is looking shaky, too.
A related finding concluded that, "Living in the middle-class area was associated with a 69percentt increased risk for nearsightedness, even after adjusting for other risk factors, such as time spent reading, outdoor activity and whether the student's parents wore glasses".
A related finding of clinical relevance was that the degree of the changes in the microcirculation seems to be related to the quality of the muscular contractions.
A related finding was the powerful role that gender played in country-to-country differences.
A related finding – that merely fixing a smile on your face can make you more upbeat – is looking shaky, too.
A closely related finding that also highlights the predictive role of ratios was reported in a recent Australian study [ 45], in which the prediction model was determined by patient age, by the number of sentinel nodes, and by the proportion of involved sentinel nodes.
A second and closely related finding addresses the potentially negative impact of strong, status quo-oriented leadership in an unbalanced system.
Wilens et al. [ 18] reported related findings from a meta-analysis of six placebo-controlled acute studies) with an ADHD-RS baseline score of 36.3, and -38.5% mean change to endpoint.
We compared changes in utilization over time and used chronic conditions (as a tracer) to relate findings of HIS [ 26] from 2000 with ours.
While the underlying mathematical formalism is the same, these latter approaches do not relate findings to a corpus of text at all and are, thus, unrelated to our method.
