The phrase "a rejection of foreign" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing policies, attitudes, or sentiments that dismiss or oppose foreign influences or entities.
Example: "The government's new policy is seen as a rejection of foreign intervention in domestic affairs."
Alternatives: "dismissal of foreign" or "refusal of foreign".
No local or systemic signs of rejection or foreign body were observed in the experimental animals transplanted with PLC membranes and HMSCs (undifferentiated and differentiated).
In the face of claims about conspiracies and plots, the young have clearly articulated a rejection of any foreign intervention.
Furthermore, by conflating a rejection of western foreign policy or certain elements of western culture with a rejection of democracy in general, the United States has rendered negotiation with Muslim groups committed to freedom virtually impossible.
Here it is being widely portrayed as a fight against supporters of terrorism, a strong rejection of foreign meddling in Egypt's internal affairs, and as a vindication of the Egyptian legal system.
But those opposed to closer relations say the president's inaction in the days after the storm, including an initial rejection of foreign aid, suggests that he is increasingly beholden to Beijing, a charge he and his political allies say is absurd.
ALGIERS, March 21 - Arab leaders arrived Monday in the Algerian capital for a summit meeting that will include a statement of solidarity with Syria and a rejection of any further "foreign intervention" in that country's promised pullout from Lebanon.
The opposite point of view - which, I reiterate, is widely held and seems to command a majority in the US House of Representatives - seems to be based in a rejection of "realism" in foreign policy.
A3 Arab Meeting in Algeria Arab leaders began arriving in the Algerian capital for a summit meeting that opens today and will include a statement of solidarity with Syria and a rejection of any further "foreign intervention" in that country's promised pullout from Lebanon.
A decade ago, the rejection of foreign brands in China on patriotic grounds would have left a prospective boycotter at a clear disadvantage, as there were simply not comparable domestic options that could seamlessly take the place of their better established, higher quality international rivals.
Bannon's point is it's not a rejection of a muscular U.S. foreign policy, it's the rejection of the idea of U.S. foreign policy as a tool for the expansion of democracy".
