Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
The questions "How did we get here?" and "What are we made of?" make sense for a reductionist, but questions such as "What is human nature?" and "How should we live?"— if they have any meaning at all — have to be reframed as questions about moving or material physical causes.
I have tried to address these questions through a reductionist approach that would allow me to investigate elementary forms of learning and memory at a cellular molecular level as specific molecular activities within identified nerve cells.
The last question is a potentially critical one as it can allow, through a reductionist approach, the identification of the minimal complexity that drives a host's response to an external perturbation.
In short, the question addressed under the heading of 'functional reduction' is this: How do functional properties fit into a reductionist perspective?
It will therefore be useful to contrast the supervenience formulation of physicalism with various reductionist proposals, and also to consider a question that has received a lot of attention in the literature, viz., whether a physicalist must be a reductionist.
It's a reductionist theory.
"I think it's a reductionist approach.
He sympathizes with choosing a reductionist approach to deconvolute variables.
The political allure of such a reductionist approach is obvious.
Wilson and his proteges, she claims, take a "reductionist" approach.
Does the current hierarchy of theories provide a reductionist explanation?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com