The phrase "a reduction relative" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe a reduction in relation to something else, but it lacks clarity and specificity.
Example: "The study showed a reduction relative to previous years' data, indicating a significant improvement."
Alternatives: "a decrease in relation to" or "a reduction in comparison to".
However, after adjusting for need variables (model 3), the coefficients showed a reduction relative to the coefficients in model 1, ranging from 82% for hospital admission to 41% for institutional care.
A rate ratio < 1 indicates a reduction relative to the referent, and the reciprocal of the rate ratio indicates the magnitude of the reduction Unadjusted traditional healthcare visits over the prior 6 months were significantly greater among workers with OA relative to no OA (p < 0.0001); the proportion of workers with these visits were generally similar across OA severity levels (Table 3).
Christensen et al. [ 10] found that an internet psycho-educational intervention which was effective in reducing depressive symptoms did not increase evidence-based help seeking but was associated with a reduction relative to a control group in seeking help from family and friends.
Similar to CF4, this corresponds to a 30% reduction relative to the late 1980s.
Other caps are presented as percentages of that reference level (e.g., 80% means a 20% reduction relative to reference emissions).
This was nearly a 10% reduction relative to previous analysis of three genomes [ 9].
This will not involve an overall cut, but an "intensity" reduction relative to the growth of the economy, he added.
Not met – The target is an 80% reduction relative to 1990 levels by 2050.
A 50% reduction relative to placebo was determined as a minimum clinically useful gain, given the lengthy duration and possible inconvenience of long-term prophylaxis.
Over the president's objection, Congress included a $6 billion spending reduction (relative to projections) in the 1968 bill imposing a 10percenttemporaryry tax surcharge.
The microbicide alone provided a 68% reduction in the risk of infection relative to that of the vaccine group and a 45% reduction relative to that of naive controls.
