The phrase "a reduction of resources" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a decrease in available materials, funds, or assets in various contexts, such as business, environmental issues, or project management.
Example: "Due to budget cuts, there has been a significant reduction of resources allocated to the research department."
Alternatives: "a decrease in resources" or "a cut in resources."
A reduction of resource allocation would postpone the withdrawal decision in the nogo condition, giving rise to a nogo-LRP.
(4) Defoliation by large herbivores will cause a reduction of resource abundance for the base of the arthropod food web (herbivores and detritivores) and also reduces habitable space for species dependent on tall vegetation structures.
Furthermore, a reduction of resource allocation to defence in the new environment (where specialist herbivores are absent) would select for allocation to traits that enhance plants' competitive ability (Blossey and Notzold 1995).
If designing good policy were a necessary and sufficient condition for addressing climate change, then I would agree that any reduction of resources from that policy-design effort would be counterproductive.
The use of SCC in construction projects allows for a reduction of human resources and equipment, which significantly decreases the labor cost and time of construction.
As pollinator species tended to have less overlap in their feeding niches in flower strips with increased functional diversity, this may lead to a reduction of flower resources available for pollinator species with a more specialized feeding niche.
The effects of insecurity on pastoral livelihoods go beyond a reduction of food resources.
Anxiety has been associated with cognitive operations that "serve the function of maintaining vigilance" and a "reduction of cognitive resources available for other tasks" (see for review Mathews, 1990 [13]).
For example, dynamic network models of the epidemic of soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) in the USA, with counties as nodes and links weighted in proportion to host cultivated area and wind speed and direction, resulted in a reduction of the resources needed to track and predict the crop epidemic (Sutrave et al. 2012).
The tall trees intercept more light and grow disproportionally more than the small ones as due to their size they achieve both a higher share of light interception and, by shading and suppressing their smaller neighbours, a reduction of their resource consumption such as water and mineral nutrients.
