The phrase "a reduction claim" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to finance, law, or any situation where a claim is made regarding a decrease in value, cost, or quantity.
Example: "The company submitted a reduction claim to the insurance provider after the damages were assessed."
Alternatives: "a claim for reduction" or "a claim of reduction".
These they defined as (1) products that result in the substantial reduction in exposure to one or more tobacco toxicants and (2), if a risk reduction claim is made, products that can reasonably be expected to reduce the risk of one or more specific diseases or other adverse health effects.
Five organic products in three different categories were offered, unobtrusively altered so that they showed a nutrition, health or risk reduction claim on two products in each choice set.
Meanwhile, just across the adjacent invisible park boundary, Grand Teton officials carry out an "elk reduction," claiming there are too many.
Environmental groups, which say the pollution reduction claim is overstated, give Governor Bush poor marks on clean air issues.
However, independent demographers question that 400 million population reduction claim, pointing out that the Chinese birth rate was already falling in the late 1970s before the one-child restriction came into force.
Consider first the normative reduction claim.
However, the influence of sugar reduction claim on hedonic expectations and healthfulness perception was modulated by the inclusion of the traffic-light system on labels (p = 0.01).
This resembles the normative reduction claim of FA theory; indeed, Scanlon endorses the strategy of explaining values in terms of reasons.
A total of twelve labels were designed following a full factorial design with three variables: dairy product (3 levels: yogurt, chocolate-flavoured milk and vanilla milk dessert), sugar reduction claim (2 levels: absent and present "20% less sugar") and traffic light system (2 levels: absent and present).
Certain "buck-passing" accounts hold the normative reduction claim without response-dependency, whereas dispositional theories, including certain forms of sentimentalism, hold response-dependency without reducing value to another normative notion.
