Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a reduced frequency for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a decrease in the occurrence or rate of something, often in scientific or technical contexts.
Example: "The study showed a reduced frequency for the occurrence of the disease in vaccinated individuals."
Alternatives: "a lower frequency of" or "a diminished frequency for".
Exact(1)
The signal distribution of the hybridising targets showed a reduced frequency for high intensity values for mouse NES compared to ALL.100.
Similar(59)
The condition is characterized by women who have a reduced desire for sex and/or a reduced frequency of sexual fantasies, either of which cause personal distress for the woman, or result in difficulty in interpersonal relationships.
One allows for a reduced frequency of ERT while on SRT maintenance therapy, improving quality of life through a reduced dependency on enzyme infusions.
Univariately, a strong association of protective equipment was identified for a reduced frequency of injury (OR = .46; 95% CI = 0.26 0.83).
As well as just adding SRT to the existing ERT, we evaluated the potential for a reduced frequency of ERT in combination with SRT (ERT4+SRT) as being another treatment option.
However, when all accepted sequences were evaluated (Table S4), we observed a non-statistically significant trend for a reduced frequency of homopolymers ≥5 in the 454-derived dataset when compared to the Sanger-derived sequence set (chi-square test, P = 0.9955).
One possible explanation for the decreased mortality could be a reduced frequency of emergence of antimicrobial resistance.
Introns generally have a reduced frequency of sites under selection compared to exons.
The absence of CEACAM1 resulted in a reduced frequency of MHV-68-specific CD8+ T cells.
Centenarians had a reduced frequency of variants at 1.6 percent compared to non-centenarians with 2.4 percent.
The study found a reduced frequency of pancreatitis in present users of exenatide, but a propensity-adjusted RR (relative risk) of 2.8 (CI 1.6 4.7) for past use.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com