Sentence examples for a recognized exception from inspiring English sources

The foundation has answered those letters on Mr. Frankel's behalf, pointing out in one response to Mr. Carlin in 2002 that parody is "protected expression under the First Amendment and a recognized exception to both copyright and trademark law".

The warrant clause of the Fourth Amendment does precisely this: unless operating under a judicially recognized exception, the police must take the bureaucratic step of going to a judge and getting a warrant before they can search or seize.

A California case coming before the court in the next term attempts to ban the sale of violent video games to minors, though there is no recognized exception to the First Amendment for violence, either.

It therefore appears that unless some recognized exception to the warrant requirement applies, See v. City of Seattle, would require a warrant to conduct the inspection sought in this case.

There are, however, a few recognized exceptions [ 21].

To Scalia, this meant what it said--subject to a small number of historically recognized exceptions, if a person provided information that was being used against a defendant in a criminal prosecution, that person had to show up personally in court so the defendant's lawyer could "confront" him through cross-examination.

Congress could likely subpoena the report in its entirety pursuant to recognized exceptions to grand jury secrecy, including a Nixon-era precedent in which courts upheld a grand jury's decision to transmit evidence and a sealed report to the House Judiciary Committee.

That requirement of procedural due process should be sedulously enforced (save for the recognized exceptions of dying declarations and the like, id., 407, 85 S.Ct., at 1069—1070) lest the theory that the end justifies the means gains further footholds here.

One would expect a hard-headed system like the common law to recognize exceptions even to the most comprehensive principle for safeguarding liberty.

To the government's argument that judges should not devise exceptions, Chief Justice Roberts said that the statute "plainly contemplates that courts would recognize exceptions -- that is how the law works". In a 1998 decision, the court ruled on the grounds of states' rights that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.

In fact, it is the Court's approach—refusing to give effect to the plain-error exception to the federal contemporaneous-objection rule, while recognizing exceptions to the analogous state rules—that gives some prisoners a "preferred status". Similarly, my approach does not afford prisoners "a second appeal," ante, at 164, thus sacrificing the interest in finality of convictions.