The phrase "a recognition trial" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to experiments, studies, or assessments where recognition is being tested or evaluated.
Example: "In the study, participants were subjected to a recognition trial to assess their memory recall abilities."
Alternatives: "a recognition test" or "a recognition assessment".
This test has both immediate and thirty-minute delay free recall trials, and a recognition trial.
Trials consisted of a sample trial (T1) and a recognition trial (T2).
Lastly, a recognition trial is presented in which the participant is required to discriminate the previously-presented words from new foil words.
The mean retention interval for a recognition trial in each block was 5 min (Trials 13 16), 13 min (Trials 17 20), and 21 min (Trials 21 24).
This test consists of five learning trials with immediate recall of words (tested after each presentation), a delayed recall trial, and a delayed recognition trial (van den Burg and Kingma 1999).
One food well was covered by a copy of the now familiar object (A2), while a novel object (B1) covered the other well, so providing an object recognition trial.
Participants were also presented a yes/no delayed recognition trial consisting of a randomized list that included the 12 target words and 12 non-target words, six of which were drawn from the same semantic categories as the targets.
Each trial is typically just one minute long, i.e., much shorter than a normal spontaneous recognition trial.
This arrangement meant that the second trial of each block was formally identical to a standard object recognition trial (e.g. Experiment 1a), but the following trials involved increasing exposure to the familiar object.
Finally, participants are read a list of 50 words, containing words from List A, List B, and distracter words that are phonetically and/or semantically related to words in either List A or B. Participants are required to identify List A words only, this being the Recognition Trial (RAVLT-R).
Four participants did not complete the RAVLT, and a further three participants chose not to complete the recognition trial of the RAVLT; eleven and 13 participants were unable to complete the GP-D and GP-ND tests, respectively.
