The phrase "a recent commentary by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a commentary or opinion piece that has been published recently, typically to attribute the source of the commentary.
Example: "In a recent commentary by the renowned economist, the implications of the new policy were thoroughly analyzed."
Alternatives: "a recent article by" or "a recent opinion piece by".
According to a recent commentary by Lawrence Summers, data from the most recent C.B.O.
A recent commentary by two Columbia University experts in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggested that colonoscopies may be no better at preventing cancer deaths than sigmoidoscopies, which are easier on the patient and have fewer complications.
And few seem to see any parallel with a recent commentary by Xinhua a state-run news agency that serves, it is worth noting, as the mouthpiece for China's government calling Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House of Representatives, "disgusting" and "detested".In this section Shovelling for their supper Manage that anger Bully pulpit Green, no queen Dumped on again Too many babies?
A recent commentary by Robert Reich provides one clear example of Obama's doing this.
A recent commentary by Jones and colleagues stressed the importance of new clinical, toxicological, and epidemiological studies, in particular those that integrate several levels of evidence over a long period [20].
This point was demonstrated clearly in a recent commentary by Ng and colleagues [ 24].
That dependence may help explain the stridency of a recent commentary published by the official Xinhua news agency.
A recent commentary published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland shows how an old tool could be used in this new context to help underwater borrowers.
Yet a recent commentary in the New York Times by Thomas Groome argues that this principle doesn't apply to women's most fundamental freedoms — the right to decide whether, how, when, and with whom we have families.
As noted in a recent commentary, trials are limited by the nutrient range that can be examined and the baseline nutrient level that can be included due to both feasibility and ethical issues, and follow-up of diseases developing years later may not be possible in most settings [ 75].
Collins was angered by a recent commentary from cardiologist Aseem Malhotra in the British Medical Journal which argued that pills were a poor replacement for better diet and more exercise – for lifestyle change, rather than tablets.
