The phrase "a reasoning processes" is not correct in English.
It should be "reasoning process" or "reasoning processes" depending on the context. You can use "reasoning process" when referring to a single instance of reasoning, and "reasoning processes" when discussing multiple instances or types of reasoning.
Example: "The reasoning process involved in solving complex problems can vary significantly from one individual to another."
Alternatives: "cognitive process" or "thought process".
Almost all theories of practical rationality conceive of it as a reasoning process where a match between beliefs and desires or goals is sought.
It consists essentially of a number of inferential rules (and/or axioms) that one is happy to accept regardless of the situation in a reasoning process.
The other element is a strategy of searching for a proof, which determines a way the premises are selected in a reasoning process.
They are in essence high-level structures that describe a reasoning process employed to solve similar problems encountered across different domains [3, 10, 31].
In this article, we specify semantic enrichment algorithms that analyse network flows concerning service usage and apply a reasoning process to identify events with user significance.
Probability arises from the argumentative quality (argumentosus), aptness (aptus), and fittingness (consentaneus) of a reasoning process (Agricola, De inventione dialectica, 210, 306; Mack 1993, 170; Spranzi-Zuber 2011, 89).
This procedure uses the capabilities of a computational tool which provides specific information that may be used inside a reasoning process to find new solutions for new problems based on past experience.
Based on a combination of inherent and user-defined evaluation criteria, the artificial intelligence system programs use a reasoning process, applying chromatographic principles and acquired experimental observations to iteratively provide a regime for a priori development of an acceptable HPLC separation method.
Screening is linked to perceptions of risk, benefit, and barriers through a reasoning process that includes personal and social influences and attitudes [ 9].
The belief that open-ended questions test high-order cognitive skills whereas multiple-choice questions do not and that therefore by inference open-ended questions evoke and test a reasoning process which is more representative of real-life problem-solving than multiple-choice, is a serious concern which I address in this review.
