The phrase "a reasoning for why" is not standard in written English; it would be more appropriate to say "a reason for why." You can use it when discussing the justification or explanation behind a particular action or decision, but it is better to use "a reason" instead.
Example: "The committee provided a reasoning for why they chose to implement the new policy, but it was unclear."
Alternatives: "an explanation for why" or "a justification for why."
As the film's sole investor, Hulme is clearly talking up Kutcher's abilities for a reason, but his reasoning for why Kutcher is a great candidate for the role is pushing it.
A physical reasoning for why systems may operate under such conditions is given based on the notions of an allowed value of amplitude of vibrations in a defined time interval of application of the excitation.
The inconsistent effect of these tertiary determinants belies inconsistencies in staff perceptions and reasoning for why an incident reports should be recorded for a fall.
This involved adding new information to the Cyc knowledge base and a new front-end interface that allows doctors to input natural-language queries such as "Find patients with bacteria after a pericardial window". Lucid should not only find the right candidate patients but provide a clear chain of logical reasoning for why it selected them.
If I can get an amazing valuation at a seed round, not give up a board seat, and keep complete control of the company, why not?" This is Ark co-founder Patrick Riley's reasoning for why instead of raising a Series A round, his people search engine just locked down a jaw-droppingly massive $4.2 million seed round.
Even in recent Vidal tributes I've seen repeated pat mis-reading of his controversial essay, "The Meaning of Timothy McVeigh," that he "sympathized" with the bomber (CNN's website ridiculously says he "befriended" McVeigh--actually, they never met), when what he did was to say that he felt he'd come to understand McVeigh's reasoning for why he committed an act of terrorism that Vidal abhorred.
The theory hypothesizes that activating learners' action systems without engaging language systems to instill propositional meaning to these actions can lead to the generation of intuitions (System 1) and insights about the conjectures (top pathway of Fig. 2), but that this by itself will not yield a valid proof that presents the chain of analytical reasoning for why the insight holds.
He then laid out his reasoning for why the state is on a "fundamentally unsustainable path," pointing his finger at the "policies and the politics mostly coming out of Springfield [which are] really at the core of the problem".
Education is a personal choice, and I'm acutely aware that my reasoning for why we homeschool may make others feel that their choices are less than optimal.
