The phrase "a reasoned hypothesis" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a hypothesis that is based on logical reasoning and evidence rather than speculation.
Example: "After analyzing the data, I formulated a reasoned hypothesis about the relationship between the variables."
Alternatives: "a logical hypothesis" or "a well-founded hypothesis".
Although this is certainly a well reasoned hypothesis, to the best of our knowledge it remains untested.
Serious methodological caveats related to these comparisons have been extensively discussed, including small samples, variation in rate of immigration in the areas samples, and the lack of a reasoned biologically plausible hypothesis linking immigration to autism [Fombonne, 2005].
The interaction between Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and otalgia is, even nowadays, a reason for speculation and hypotheses raising.
Alan Musgrave has astutely remarked that even if we agree that the fact that a theory has so far survived severe tests does not provide a reason for the hypothesis, nevertheless it does provide a reason for believing the hypothesis (Musgrave 1974).
5, 11, 86, 87 For these reasons, a hypothesis that the results in this study reflect cross-reactivity to an undiscovered lyssavirus is one for which evidence is lacking but is also not an explanation that can be ruled out.
According to one hypothesis, a reason for coevolving pairs is to suppress a decrease in stability or function produced by a mutation at one site with an increase in stability or function provided by a mutation in a residue near the site of the first mutation [66], [67], [68].
Lobachevsky and Bolyai reasoned about the hypothesis of the acute angle in the manner of Saccheri and Lambert and recovered their results about the areas of triangles.
The selection criterion is that there must be a reason to suspect that the hypothesis is true, and we will have such a reason if the hypothesis makes whichever observed facts we are interested in explaining a matter of course.
If there is to be a reason for favoring the representationalist hypothesis, it will therefore have to be a priori in character, and it is more than a little difficult to see what it might be.
