The phrase "a rationale for interventions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reasoning or justification behind specific actions or measures taken in various contexts, such as healthcare, education, or social programs.
Example: "The study provided a clear rationale for interventions aimed at improving student performance in underfunded schools."
Alternatives: "justification for actions" or "reasoning behind measures".
Ann Swidler (1986) noted that culture reveals itself in unsettled times – an insight that provides a rationale for interventions that expand theoretical repertoires, thereby enabling participants to reflexively engage with their lifeworlds – becoming aware of things they previously were unaware of, and making changes when and as they feel change is necessary.
This may help us further understand how different factors related to the work setting, nature of work, individual characteristics, and context influence different forms of absenteeism, thereby providing a rationale for interventions to address it.
However, we anticipate that there will be: an information package that summarises the nature of each intervention; a rationale for the interventions, questions that assist the patient in reviewing their current health status and the value they place on possible future scenarios, and what is known about the effectiveness of the interventions.
This suggests a rationale for government interventions aimed at addressing self-control problems to induce individuals to make better health decisions.
This may provide a rationale for therapeutic interventions at an early stage of the disease process before overt CV disease has developed.
It provides a rationale for therapeutic interventions aimed at activating progenitors or recruiting them from their niche to the injury site (Steinhauser & Lee, 2009).
This finding offers a rationale for pharmacological intervention in the treatment of cartilage repair in osteoarthritis and potentially of other joint-related diseases and shows that IGFBPs are pertinent target candidates for this purpose.
In this review, we summarize the pros and cons of medical therapies, point out certain areas of controversy, and propose a rationale for early intervention.
It is only by demonstrating this, whilst explaining the flaws in the literature, that a rationale for early intervention in bipolar disorder may be advanced.
Altogether, our observations provide a rationale for therapeutic intervention to restore suppressive activity by T regs in SSc.
