The phrase "a range of specificity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the varying levels of detail or precision in a particular context or subject matter.
Example: "In our analysis, we observed a range of specificity in the responses from participants, indicating differing levels of understanding."
Alternatives: "a spectrum of detail" or "a variety of precision".
The onset of these symbioses has been shown to display flexibility, but a range of specificity, i.e. from highly flexible to highly specific, is apparent during its maintenance [ 3- 8].
This enables a range of specificity, allowing security policy and component discovery queries to apply to a particular component, or a group.
The pivot shift test showed a range of sensitivity from 0.18 to 0.92 and a range of specificity from 0.97 to 0.99 (pooled data were not available).
The anterior drawer test showed a range of sensitivity from 0.18 to 0.92 (pooled sensitivity 0.62) and a range of specificity from 0.78 to 0.98 (pooled specificity 0.88).
The Lachman test showed a range of sensitivity from 0.63 to 0.93 (pooled sensitivity 0.86) and a range of specificity from 0.55 to 0.99 (pooled specificity 0.91).
Finally, we assessed, over a range of specificity, the sensitivity and timeliness of syndromic surveillance and the detection benefit of syndromic surveillance compared with clinical case finding for each simulated outbreak.
PRISE can be used to design primers with a range of specificities, targeting individual sequences as well as diverse assemblages of genes.
GC reactions to complex antigens permit a range of specificities and affinities, with potential advantages for broad protection.
They found a range of sensitivities from 0.30 – 0.99 and a range of specificities from 0.39 – 0.93, with a weighted mean sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 and 0.69, respectively.
In contrast, as with PNKP, aprataxin shows a range of specificities depending on phosphorylation, which vary from a 121-fold discrimination in favor of XRCC4 to a 5-fold preference for tri-phospho XRCC1 over mono-phosphorylated (pT233) XRCC4.
Second, GO, as most current ontologies, is generally unfinished and contains a range of specificities of functional descriptions at the same depth of the ontology (Alterovitz et al., 2010).
