The phrase "a range of familiar" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a variety of things that are well-known or easily recognized within a certain context.
Example: "The exhibition featured a range of familiar artworks that resonated with the audience."
Alternatives: "a variety of known" or "a selection of recognizable".
The beneficiaries of Mickey's wit and wisdom cover a range of familiar archetypes.
A viral film featuring a montage of images representing a range of familiar nicknames, from puppies to jugs, is used to describe women's breasts.
With less than 50 days until primary voting begins, the Democratic contenders showed off newly polished answers on a range of familiar questions.
He was one of the few Asian Americans to get steady work in Hollywood in these years, though the roles he was given consisted, of course, of a range of familiar stereotypes.
Sci-fi fans will see a range of familiar texts echoed in the broadstrokes outline of Sunshine, most notably Paul WS Anderson's Event Horizon, a flawed but fascinating Nineties Brit-pic in which a lost spaceship re-emerges from a black hole having been to hell and back - literally.
The city of Sochi, on the edge of the Black Sea, embodies a range of familiar Olympic problems: concerns about the host city's political climate and human-rights record; threats of boycotts; geographic flaws that present maddening logistical concerns; frantic and expensive local development that is intended to serve specific, idiosyncratic, short-term needs at the expense of long-term planning.
Gyllenhaal's performance offers a conspicuous display of formidable skill within the film's familiar range of conventional drama.
Not the Final Agenda has fringe meetings taking place in a range of hotels familiar to anyone who has spent time in English seaside resorts.
Not only can Mr. Hastings cull from a range of less familiar sources (even if they could be better footnoted), but he also covers six months to her one.
Each seems easily to fit into a range of puzzles familiar to thinkers in both traditions.
But Seigel's film is unusually propulsive and evocative; he has chosen the right clips and clippings, the most artful and evocative photographs, talked to a range of people familiar (some intimately) with the subject, and put it all together to a sympathetic score by Chicago jazz stalwart Joshua Abrams.
