Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a randomly sample of" is not correct.
Did you mean "a random sample of"? You can use "a random sample of" when referring to a subset of a population that is selected in such a way that every individual has an equal chance of being chosen.
Example: "In our study, we collected data from a random sample of participants to ensure the results were representative of the larger population."
Alternatives: "a random selection of" or "a random subset of".
Exact(1)
This was a cross-sectional survey with a randomly sample of university employees (n=409).
Similar(59)
Figure 5A shows an example Splitstree of a randomly sampled set of 25 sequences of each phenotype in the NSI/SI dataset.
One approach to this obstacle is to build the LSI representation on a randomly sampled subset of the documents in the collection, following which the remaining documents are ''folded in" as detailed with Equation 244.
Of the patients in this trial, paraffin embedded material was available from a randomly sampled group of 394 patients.
First, a randomly sampled subcohort of 709 children provided 542 nonwheezers as an unbiased control sample for analyses using this phenotype, as well as 167 wheezers.
From March 2001 to September 2002, a randomly sampled group of 720 pregnant women from the same control cohort described above were invited to attend a sub-study of PACT [ 17].
Reliability and validity of the polymorphism analysis were assessed through a repeat analysis using a randomly sampled 10% of the data.
For performance reasons, the candidates for eviction consist of a randomly selected sample of size β of the cached objects.
The second sample utilizes a randomly selected sample of public high school adolescents in a Midwestern state and was collected in 2003.
The INO agreed to forward letters on behalf of the research team to a randomly selected sample of 250 of its migrant nurse membership.
We designed a questionnaire and used it to survey a randomly selected sample of customers of IB from the Yellow Pages, and obtained 203 usable responses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com