Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
The phrase "a quite narrow" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would be "quite narrow" or "a rather narrow."
Example: "The path was quite narrow, making it difficult for two people to walk side by side."
Alternatives: "somewhat narrow" or "fairly narrow."
Exact(27)
"That did contain attributes which sought to define modernization in a quite narrow way".
Both processes can coexist only in a quite narrow temperature range, which is a nonlinear function of egg processing time.
Alan Smart, energy operations manager at National Grid, said: "It's becoming more important to be able to predict output within a quite narrow spectrum of weather conditions.
The HA prodrug can form remarkable core shell micelles with a quite narrow size distribution which was confirmed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
According to the results obtained, one may state that the present situation imposes a quite narrow limit on the wind energy contributing to the fulfilment of the local societies electrical needs.
The as-prepared Si films on the p-type Si substrates exhibit a quite narrow distribution of pore size and the average dimension of nanopores is found to be 26.7 nm, following a typical Gaussian distribution.
Similar(33)
It's all quite narrow, quite hypnotic.
Indeed, we found that the range of influx that can support a population is quite narrow.
Remarkably, despite these decades-long conversations, for a cis-gender man, the definition of what it means to be a "man" is still quite narrow.
In the northeast, the Escalante River has cut deep into the sandstone over many millennia to create a tangle of interconnected, sometimes quite narrow, steep-sided canyons that provide a challenge for hikers.
"We are quite narrow minded," a 16-year-old high school student said, asking that her name not be used when talking about Mr. Jeyaretnam.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com