The phrase "a quality judgment" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing an assessment or evaluation of the quality of something, often in contexts like reviews, critiques, or decision-making processes.
Example: "The committee's decision was based on a quality judgment of the submitted proposals."
Alternatives: "an evaluative assessment" or "a quality assessment".
On the other hand, the system can be considered as an intelligent one as it has the ability to offer the potential user a particular type of quality judgment for its risk output.
On the other hand, the appearance of fruits is a primary factor in quality judgment for the consumers concerned.
Such inconsistencies among datasets may actually represent a problem when dealing with ML methodologies, since databases cover different signal populations and sample the relationship (signal, quality judgment) in a non-uniform way.
These values were chosen from amongst 19 estimates of attributable mortality and 11 estimates of increases to length of stay identified in a literature search, as they were of high quality (judgment based on Samore and Harbarth [ 23]) and the population was comparable to our ICU context.
A mean of the two scores was computed and classified as the final quality judgment.
Finally, two just-noticeable-change calculations are presented that are based on colorimetric and visual air quality judgment studies.
In particular we investigate how changing the quality of the region of interest of a video affects its overall perceived quality, and we quantify the importance of the visual quality of the region of interest to the overall quality judgment.
Results showed that atypical shaped packaging design enhanced cognitive processing, which in turn decreased the persuasive impact of weak claims on willingness to pay, and increased the persuasive impact of strong product claims on quality judgment.
Through simulating three-phase voltage of electronic power system, this paper completes voltage fluctuation rate monitor of electronic power system and electronic power quality judgment, as well as verifies accuracy of algorithm diagram procedure.
The mean of the scores of the two reviewers was computed and classified as the final quality judgment; in case the scores of the reviewers differed more than 2 points, reviewers discussed their assessments and came to a new joint score (this was only needed once, mean difference score was 0.91).
