Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a qualified technician" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a technician who has the necessary skills, training, or certification to perform specific tasks or jobs.
Example: "Before proceeding with the repairs, we need to ensure that a qualified technician is available to handle the equipment."
Alternatives: "a certified technician" or "an experienced technician."
Exact(13)
The plumbers should have contacted the regional office of the State Department of Environmental Conservation, which would have gotten a qualified technician to supervise the cleanup, Dan Farrell, a department spokesman, said.
A qualified technician earns between £16,800 and £20,300.
A qualified technician can help you get set up.
Dual-Vision XC cameras, manufactured by Rosco Vision Systems, were installed in the vehicles by a qualified technician.
A qualified technician drew venous blood samples from them.
Radiographer A person who helps the radiologist during radiological examinations, and who is a qualified technician in medical imagery.
Similar(47)
The camera needs a specially qualified technician to operate it since it's quite complicated and takes great skill to move it, manipulate the bellows for changes in magnification, adjust the lens and load and process the chemistry and the paper.
They may provide emergency cover when other units are not available, or when accompanied by a fully qualified technician or paramedic.
The law requires a physician or qualified technician to perform the ultrasound and position the screen so the woman may view the images.
And they did not dispute that Murray left Jackson alone after administering a dose of it on the morning of his death – even though standard medical practice insists on an anaesthesiologist or qualified technician remaining at the patient's side at all times.
The qualified technician drew venous blood samples from the mothers for the assessment of their anaemia.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com